When watching a crime show on
television, reading a novel, or reading history, the motive is always an
important part of any crime. We need to
look at possible motives involved in today’s politics.
The motive for politicians from both
parties, when avoiding comprehensive immigration reform, is quite obvious. They all know illegal immigration is bad for America and promotes drug and sex trafficking, but
it is good for large political donors who want open borders and cheap workers. Immigration reform has been a political
football for over forty years, but the political establishment never wanted to
fix the problem. It was a talking point
with no serious action until Trump ran for President.
What was Trump’s motive for running for
President? He gave up a profitable and
comfortable career that made him billions for a job where he is attacked daily
by the left and by the media. He even donates
his salary to charity. This is crazy by
most standards. His only motive was that
he thought the country he loved was in trouble and felt it his civic duty to
step up and save it.
What is the motive for attacking Trump
and the Russia hoax? With the Mueller
investigation over, it is obvious that Trump did nothing wrong. We do know there was corruption at the
highest levels of government to prevent Trump’s election, because he was not
part of the establishment and could not be controlled. These criminals must continue to attack Trump
in order to avoid prosecution.
The liberal left now says Trump
obstructed justice since Mueller said there was no collusion. What would be Trump’s motive? He can’t cover-up something that never
happened. This is makes no sense.
President Trump is obviously motivated
to be the most transparent President in history. He tweets his thoughts all the time. Trump had every right to fire Jeff Sessions
as Attorney General, but did not. Naming
Sessions as Attorney General was the biggest mistake Trump has made in his
political career.
Trump did not fire Mueller or any of
Mueller’s staff when he had every legal right to do so. He gave Mueller full access to interview his
White House staff and told his staff to answer all questions truthfully. Mueller interrogated the White House General
Council for 30 hours. Trump had every
legal right to claim Executive Privilege and make redactions in the Mueller
report, but he did not make a single redaction.
This is amazing and unprecedented for any President in history to be
this transparent.
Our trade policies have been a disaster
for America for decades.
The motive is simply that big businesses dealing in a world markets want
a global economy and don’t care how bad it hurts America and the American worker.
Globalists also want world-wide income
redistribution for business profits and making the rich, richer. Wealth redistribution is the real motive
behind the carbon-control-to-prevent-climate-change hoax. They know man cannot control the climate, but
they can gain power with wealth redistribution.
What was Hillary Clinton’s motive for
destroying e-mails, bleach bit and destroying devices? Maybe she was ignorant that having a private
server in her bathroom closet presented a security violation. Maybe she was careless about having
classified information on her private server.
But, what was the motive for destroying evidence which did not hide either
of these crimes? She maybe could explain
the two crimes, but what was on those e-mails to warrant destroying evidence
and obstructing justice? It must have
been incriminating of bigger crimes to warrant committing several additional
felonies.
“Trump did not bring division.
Division brought Trump.
If you don’t see that, then you’re
part of the problem.”
Ava Armstrong
God bless President
Trump and guide him to make America great again.
Terry,
ReplyDeleteHere you go again, regurgitating mostly Fox Channel pundit opinions without citation. Opinions are OK, but facts really do matter. The Special Councils’ Report has plenty of facts which are cited in reference to some of the opinions offered in your blog titled “Motive.”
You state: [Russia] “they definitely wanted Hillary to win”
Volume I, page 1 of the Special Council Report
“As set forth in detail in this report, the Special Council’s investigation established that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election principally through two operations. First, a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Second, a Russian intelligence service conducted counter-intrusion operation against entities, employees, and volunteers working on the Clinton Campaign and then released stolen documents. The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign.”
Volume I, page 147 of the Special Council Report
Krill Dimitriev is a Russian national who was appointed CEO of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), when it was founded in 2011. Dimitriev reported directly to Putin and frequently referred to Putin as his “boss.”
Volume I, page 149 of the Special Council Report
“at approximately 2:40 am on November 9, 2016, news reports stated that Clinton had called President-Elect Trump to concede. At [redacted as Investigative Technique] wrote to Dimitriev “Putin has won.”
You state: “the liberal left now says Trump obstructed justice.” There is no citation here either. According to the Office of Legal Council (OLB) policy a sitting President cannot be criminally prosecuted therefore charges of obstruction of justice were not sought by the Special Council. That said, anyone reading the Special Councils’ Report could readily conclude obstruction.
Volume II, page 8 of the Special Council Report
The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a prosecutorial judgement. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgement.
You state: [Trump] “he told his staff to answer all questions truthfully.” Clearly in the case of Don McGahn he did when under oath speaking with Special Council investigators. It was later that the President asked McGahn to lie that he refused.
Volume II, page 113 of the Special Council Report
“The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the Chief of Staff present and tried to get McGahn to say the president never ordered him to fire the Special Council. McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President’s direction to remove the Special Council was accurate. In the same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told the Special Council investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Council removed.”
The entire Special Council Report is available as a PDF for download from most reliable news sources. It’s a good read. I recommend it the everyone.
Kent Schulze
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNow you are aware of how to get an outstanding loan with no headaches or stress. Being an on-line marketer, if you neglect to process requests online, you shed a lot of money in shed revenue. You are curious to know more about piermont grand EC, check it out.
ReplyDelete