I am not going to talk about abortion. It is a complicated issue with strong emotions on both sides. It also has become a political tool.
I
am going to talk about the Constitution, states’ rights, division of power, and
the democratic process of this great republic.
The Constitution and the 10th Amendment make it obvious, even
to a layman, that that the federal government has no authority to deal with
abortion. This issue is clearly the
responsibility of the states or citizens.
The
Constitution also clearly defines the responsibility and authority of the three
branches of the federal government. The
Congress makes the laws and sets the budget.
The
executive branch is responsible for enforcing the laws and not making them. Someone should tell President Biden
this.
The
Supreme Court is responsible for insuring that the Constitution is not
violated. They do not have any authority
to legislate or promote any political agenda.
Roe
V. Wade was a Supreme Court decision in 1973.
It is probably the worst decision in fifty years. It is a political decision that violates the
Constitution and states rights.
Someone
leaked a document that appears to overturn Roe V. Wade. Whoever did this is part of the delusional W
Whoever
committed this act needs to be fired, disbarred, never allowed to practice law,
and prosecuted for their crimes. It is a
felony to try to intimidate a judge. We
cannot allow a small delusional
mob threaten our Supreme Court
Justices.
The
decision leaked does not ban abortion.
It is all about the Constitution and states rights. Here is some of the conclusion:
“The
Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or
prohibiting abortion.”
“Roe and Casey abrogated the authority. We now overrule those decisions and return
that authority to the people and their elected representatives.”
This does not ban abortion. It means
the people will have the right to vote on how abortion is to be regulated in
their state. Rule by the people and
their elected representative is how a democratic republic works.
Allowing
the Supreme Court to violate the Constitution, the federal division of power, and
states rights was a huge mistake in 1973.
It is about time this mistake was corrected.
When
the liberal Left is protesting the decision, they are denying the Constitution,
states rights, and citizens the right to vote.
They are giving all the power to a political oligarchy. This leads to tyranny, not democracy.
We must fight for fair elections and
take control back from the DC establishment and
Business
Fits by Terry Oliver Lee is available on Amazon as an e-book or a
paperback. http://BusinessFits.com
The U.S. Constitution was drafted and approved by white men. Many were slave owners and virtually all held their positions primarily because they were property owners.
ReplyDeleteThe Constitution as written was imperfect. Only 2 years later 10 amendments were added (The Bill of Rights). Since then, an additional 17 amendments have been offered and supported by approval of a ¾ majority of states. One of those amendments was to repeal an amendment 14 years after it was adopted, apparently by mistake. The equal rights amendment for women has recently been approved by enough states, but not within the prescribed time limit.
The Constitution is an important document as adopted 233 years ago, but in a different time by different people. Had the document been perfect it would have anticipated the need for state and individual rights separate from the Federal government. This led to the need for a Bill of Rights. But even after the first 10 amendments, had sufficient rights been spelled out there would have been no need for another 17 amendments. Most significant were those to end slavery, grant citizenship to natural born persons (slaves) and grant voting rights to women and those 18 years or older.
Today an argument has been put forth for states to have the sole right to decide a women’s right of choice about her body. Had that been the case in the past we could have states still allowing slavery and voting limited to white males. It is also argued that the right of choice by women was not specifically granted by the Constitution and thereby is only granted nationally by a Supreme Court opinion. Is it necessary to have a Constitutional amendment for this right to prevail or shall we just let the Court’s opinion stand as precedent?
I recently found many useful information in your website especially this blog page. Among the lots of comments on your articles. Thanks for sharing. unique business names,
ReplyDelete