Amendment IV
The right of the
people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants
shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and
particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to
be seized.
This amendment is part of what is
normally referred to as the Bill of Rights.
The founding Fathers knew how they been treated by the British and wanted
to protect this God given right. It is
very clear and easy to understand.
Now let’s take a look at the Search
Warrant used to raid Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home:
Property to be seized
C. Any government and/or
Presidential Records created between
Any literate person of reasonable
intelligence can clearly see that this search warrant violates the 4th
Amendment and is illegal. It is simply a
fishing exposition to harass Trump. I
don’t care if you are Democrat, Republican, or Independent; you have to be
appalled by this type of government over-reach and corruption.
The
affidavit for the warrant to raid Trump’s home has been released. Over half of it has been redacted. This cover-up proves that the search warrant
was in violation of the 4th Amendment and should be prosecuted as a
felony,
What
are we going to do about the corrupt politicization of the FBI and DOJ? This can’t be allowed to continue if our
Constitutional republic is going to survive.
We must fight for fair elections and take control back
from the DC establishment and
Business Fits by Terry Oliver Lee is available on Amazon as an e-book or a paperback. http://BusinessFits.com
Rather than be cynical about such an irresponsible blog post, assume facts matter.
ReplyDeleteStart with the neutrality of judge Reinhart that signed off on the Mara-Logo warrant. U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart was a Magistrate judge that was appointed, as was typical, by majority vote of the U.S. district judges of the court. He was not appointed by any past or present President. As for qualifications, why would this judge not have a full understanding of the 4th amendment to the constitution he took an oath to uphold?
Now the blogger writes: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.”
The problem with this use of the 4th amendment as a defense against the Mara-Logo search is that it attempts to use “persons, houses, papers and effects” as if the person subject to the search was ENTITED to the contents of the materials sought by the warrant.
The warrant clearly states a request to search for “any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017 and January 20, 2020” The materials sought were NOT the property of the resident of Mara-Logo.
The materials called for in the warrant were very specific. Further, it is insulting for the blogger to assume, as quoted from the blog that, “any literate person of reasonable intelligence can clearly see that this search warrant violates the 4th Amendment.” It does not, and any literate person knows that.
The last three paragraphs in this blog post are outrageous and incendiary: redactions in a warrant should be PROSECUTED as a felony, a call to ACTION AGAINST a claim of corruption in the FBI and DOJ and a call to FIGHT for fair elections.
Irresponsible. Facts matter.