I was disappointed and upset with Pope
Francis last week when he said Donald Trump was not a Christian if he builds
walls and not bridges. The Pope is the
head of the large and powerful Roman Catholic Church, but I do not think he has
the right to sit in judgment and determine if another person is a
Christian.
I think a
little history is relevant. The Vatican
is a 110 acre walled city ruled as an absolute monarchy by the Pope. The walls were originally built to keep out
invading Muslims. Doesn’t this sound
similar to the proposed wall Trump is proposing for our national security?
We all have
our own morality, and if we are Christian, we might think someone’s actions or
opinion does not fit with ours. That is
our right, but I certainly do not think any church leader should publicize an
opinion that someone is not a Christian.
I believe a
person can be a Christian and not show it in the same way another person
does. For example, it is not necessary
to go to church every week to be a Christian.
We all have our own beliefs and probably several different levels of
ethics depending on the situation.
I once gave a
sermon when our church was without a minister.
My topic was that we had different levels of morality in church, at
home, and at work. That is certainly true
for some politicians who feel telling lies is permitted in politics.
Our Founding
Fathers felt Christian morality was essential if this great republic was to
survive. They protected that right of
religion in the First Amendment. The
Founding Fathers wanted religion in government, but they did not want the
government dictating religion. They
would be very upset with the convoluted separation of church and state
interpretation we currently have which restricts the very religious freedoms
they were trying to protect.
The Pope
justifies his statement by stating he is an advocate of the poor. This is admirable, but he is mistaken in how
to achieve the goal of helping the poor.
He criticizes capitalism and advocates socialism. This is wrong. We need to look at the facts.
The poor live
better in our capitalist country than in any socialist country. Charity from both the government and the
private sector help the poor more world-wide than any socialist country. Capitalism also gives people to opportunity
to work their way out of poverty.
The Pope
advocates charity. The people of this
capitalist country show great charity at home and abroad. That is part of capitalism. A socialist country, by definition, advocates
the government should collect taxes and determine who is worthy of receiving
charity. Socialist leaders do not feel
the people are capable of making these decisions.
I have been
talking about Christians, but this should include all religions that advocate peace,
good moral conduct, respect the law, and freedom of religion. This does not include any religion that
advocates a world-wide caliphate by any means, including beheading Christians. We have to protect ourselves from this very
real danger.
Terry: I read every one of your post. I find them succinct and common-sensical (sorry, that's not a word but you get the drift). I did not hear the Pope's critique of Donald Trump but I politely disagree with your opinion that he had no right to criticize him, the sins of the Catholic church beside. Honestly, Mr. Trump talks in such a way that his words, style and demeanor reveal that whatever else may be going on in him he is not strongly motivated by Christian faith. If that sounds judgmental than I guess it is but citizens are called upon to vote upon their convictions. I think it is legitimate for citizens to expect their President to behave presidential. All I seem to see is a lot of behavior we wouldn't tolerate on the playground let alone a platform (to be fair to him, with a few exceptions many other Republican candidates have behaved badly as well.) Thanks for continuing to post your thoughts on government, business, life and the like. I am not just saying this but I read your blog posts fairly religiously.
ReplyDeleteIt is also absurd to compare the Catholic Church (in which I was raised and no longer support) of centuries ago, and a major player in the politics/intrigue/corruption of that day, protecting itself from invading armies, to the current situation of fleeing migrants. So, NO, it doesn't sound similar.
Delete