Tuesday, March 15, 2022

A Frightening Thought

I have a scary thought for you.  The people that are in charge of our involvement in Ukraine are the same people who were in charge of the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

The Afghan withdrawal was a total disaster.  Biden could not have screwed it up any worse if he was trying.  Maybe he was.

Americans and Afghan interpreters died.  Americans and Afghan interpreters and their families were left behind and are still there if they are even still alive. 

We surrendered Bagram military airfield to the Taliban.  We also surrendered $80 billion in military supplies and equipment to them.  There is absolutely no excuse for this. 

Now these same idiots are controlling our involvement in Ukraine.  Russia never should have invaded Ukraine.  Russia invaded countries when Biden, Obama, and George W. Bush were President.  He never made any such attempts while Trump was President.  This is not a coincidence.

The invasion of Ukraine was not a surprise.  It was a distinct possibility since November of 1921 and should have been dealt with then. 

The U.S. was involved with getting Ukraine to give up their nuclear weapons with the understanding that we would protect them.  That has not worked out well for Ukraine.

The US and NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) pushed for Ukraine to become a member nation.  Putin had a huge problem with Ukraine joining NATO.  I can understand why.  Ukraine and Russia share a boarder.  It would be like us allowing Cuba to have nuclear missiles in our back yard.  The idea of Ukraine joining NATO should have been dropped.

The best way to control Russia is with oil and natural gas.  The United States was energy independent and exporting oil and natural gas when Trump was President.  Putin was planning the invasion of Ukraine the moment Biden took office and started to destroy our fossil fuel industry.  Biden should have been smart enough to see this last November and reversed his destructive energy policies.

We should have begun weaponizing Ukraine the moment Putin started moving troops and equipment to the Ukraine/Russian border.  Ukraine could use the $80 billion in military equipment we left for the Taliban in Afghanistan.  If Ukraine was well armed, would Putin have tried an invasion?

Ukraine needs to be able to control their airspace.  They needed and still need planes, but it may be too late.  We should have done something like FDRs Lend-Lease program with Britain in WWII last year. 

Why didn’t Biden give them our planes that the Air Force has retired and parked in the desert?  Most of these planes are still operational.  There are over 200 planes sitting in the desert including over 50 F-15s, over 50 F-16s, and over 40 A-10s.  Would Putin have considered an invasion if he knew Ukraine had over 140 fighter planes?  I don’t think so.  It is too late for these planes to be helpful now as there is no time for Ukraine to train pilots.

I hope Biden’s incompetence and commitment to the delusional climate change Left does not get us into WWIII.  We could see Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea unite to conquer the world.  WWII was bad because of two fronts with Germany and Japan.  WWIII with four fronts could be a disaster.

                               

We must fight for fair elections and take control back from the DC establishment and Deep State.  These are the first steps to take back this country.

           

Business Fits by Terry Oliver Lee is available on Amazon as an e-book or a paperback.     http://BusinessFits.com

2 comments:

  1. Unfortunately, it’s not possible to avoid comment on this outlandish blog. It is so filled with so much mis-information and misguided opinions. Here are a few the those opinions, and some thought-full comments.

    “The invasion of Ukraine was not a surprise. It was a distinct possibility since November of 1921 and should have been dealt with then.” Assuming the author meant 2021, a later proposal postulated:
    “Why didn’t Biden give them our planes that the Air Force has retired and parked in the desert? Most of these planes are still operational.”
    Is that a known fact they were still operational?

    “There are over 200 planes sitting in the desert including over 50 F-15s, over 50 F-16s, and over 40 A-10s. Would Putin have considered an invasion if he knew Ukraine had over 140 fighter planes? I don’t think so.”
    First, no one knows what Putin thinks. Second, what’s the likelihood Putin would have considered arming Ukraine a clear provocation. He has stated Ukraine joining NATO would be a provocation.

    “The U.S. was involved with getting Ukraine to give up their nuclear weapons with the understanding that we would protect them. That has not worked out well for Ukraine.”
    Hard to tell what these statements meant. Was giving up the nuclear weapons a bad idea? What level of protection was offered? Please explain. Short of troops on the ground and a no-fly zone, the U.S. is offering a great deal of support. What has not worked out well for Ukraine are the war crimes being committed by Russian soldiers under the direction of the Russian government.

    “The US and NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) pushed for Ukraine to become a member nation. Putin had a huge problem with Ukraine joining NATO. I can understand why. Ukraine and Russia share a boarder. It would be like us allowing Cuba to have nuclear missiles in our back yard. The idea of Ukraine joining NATO should have been dropped.”
    This border problem is no way near analogous. Are there nuclear weapons in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland and Romania that are NATO countries that currently border Russia?

    In a second comment to follow addresses this blogger’s infatuation with Fox pundit Tucker Carlson’s on Russia and its borders. It helps explain where he gets some of his preposterous statements.

    “The best way to control Russia is with oil and natural gas.”
    The U.S is still exporting energy. The U.S. is no longer importing energy from Russia. The U.S. continues to promote clean energy sources. Controlling a country requires a successful invasion. Russia is trying one on a sovereign country. That’s not what the U.S. should do. Organizing allies in a boycott as a penalty for hostility is reasonable.

    “We could see Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea unite to conquer the world. WWII was bad because of two fronts with Germany and Japan. WWIII with four fronts could be a disaster.”
    If you really think the prospect of nuclear war will come down to 4 fronts, you are totally naive.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anyone wondering where the blogger gets his theories need only look to his sources.

    On 3/05/19 the blogger wrote: Thank God for FOX news. If it were not for FOX, the public would have no way to get true and balanced news.

    On 9/24/19 the blogger stated: “If you have time for only one weekday news show, I would recommend Tucker Carlson tonight. Anyone who distorts the truth is fair game for him.”

    On March 3, the same day Russians bombed Ukrainian cities as part of the illegal invasion of Ukraine, the Kremlin sent out talking points to state-friendly media outlets with a request: Use more Tucker Carlson. In a 12-page document the Kremlin states:

    “It is essential to use as much as possible fragments of broadcasts of the popular Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who sharply criticizes the actions of the United States [and] NATO, their negative role in unleashing the conflict in Ukraine, [and] the defiantly provocative behavior from the leadership of the Western countries and NATO towards the Russian Federation and towards President Putin, personally,”

    The document sums up Carlson’s position: “Russia is only protecting its interests and security.” The memo includes a quote from Carlson: “And how would the US behave if such a situation developed in neighboring Mexico or Canada?”

    Prior to the Russian invasion, Carlson is quoted as saying:
    “Why do Democrats want you to hate Putin? Has Putin shipped every middle-class job in your town to Russia? Did he manufacture a worldwide pandemic that wrecked your business? Is he teaching your kids to embrace racial discrimination? Is he making fentanyl? Does he eat dogs?”

    Carlson has repeatedly noted there was no reason for the United States to assist Ukraine in its battle with Russia and insisted it was “not treason, it is not un-American” to support Putin. He contends Ukraine was not “a democracy” but a “client state” of the US government.

    Recently Carlson claimed that the “Russian disinformation they’ve been telling us for days is a lie and a conspiracy theory and crazy and immoral to believe is, in fact, totally and completely true.”

    ReplyDelete