Axe Murders

       

Once when I was a kid, we took a trip to visit my brother in Tulsa.  Highway 71 was the route we took in Iowa.  This highway took us through Villisca, Iowa, where we stopped to see the house where there had been a horrific crime in June of 1912.

Sometime during the night of June 9/10, 1912, Josiah (43), his wife Sarah (39), their children Herman (11), Katherine (10), Boyd (7), and Paul (5) were all killed with an axe.  Katherine had invited two friends, Ida (8) and Lena (12) Stillinger to stay overnight.  They were also killed. 

All eight people were bludgeoned to death in their beds with an axe.  Josiah and Sarah were probably killed first, then their children.  Ida and Lena were probably killed last in a downstairs guest bedroom.  Lena was the only person that seemed to have put up a fight, and may have been sexually assaulted. 

There were several suspects for the crime, but no one was ever convicted of the crime.  A Reverend George Kelly was a traveling minister that had been in town and left with his wife early the morning the bodies were found.  He was tried twice.  The first trial ended with a hung jury, and the second trial ended with a verdict of not guilty.  The crime was never solved.

In 1892, Lizzie Borden was a 32-year-old woman accused of killing her father and stepmother with an axe in Fall River, Massachusetts.  She was eventually acquitted of the crime.  No one else was ever charged with the crime.  There was a poem written about her.  Kids sometimes skipped rope to the rhyme.  It went like this. 

        Lizzie Borden took an axe

        And gave her mother forty whacks.

        When she saw what she had done

        She gave her father forty-one.

With horrific crimes like this committed with an axe, it was fortunate that our federal government made it illegal for private citizens to own axes.  Oh, what a minute.  That never happened.  It would be stupid to blame the ax for the crime. 

The FBI statistics, from 2005 to 2011, show that far more people were killed with blunt instruments like hammers and clubs than by rifles.  I assume this number would include the so-called assault rifles, but not handguns or shotguns. 

Why do Progressives want the federal government to violate Second Amendment rights for guns?  Personally, I think it is more political and about control than it is about protecting the public.

The Fiscal Cliff

       

There is a lot of talk about avoiding the fiscal cliff with last minute legislation by our federal government at the end of 2012.  That legislation is a joke.  It does nothing to address the real fiscal cliff that is approaching.  It did not reduce spending, the deficit, or our debt.  Debt is the real approaching fiscal cliff.

We are approaching our debt limit again.  This means we must increase it again or default on some of our debts.  Either way, our credit rating will probably be lowered again.  It has already been lowered twice, first in April 2012 and again in September 2012.  With our lower credit rating, interest on our debt may go up, accelerating the problem.  President Obama even suggested Congress should allow him to increase the debt ceiling as he saw fit.  What idiot would allow that?  But, in hindsight, we have done dumber things.

All our legislators did was kick the can down to road and make the potential problem worse.  They did manage to put in earmarks for their favorite pork spending projects.  This is just thumbing their nose at the American people, and we are paying them for this kind of incompetence.  It would be tough to keep your job with this kind of incompetence in the private sector. 

Politicians continue to grow the size of our federal government, government spending, and government debt.  This action is irresponsible, or maybe they are intentionally increasing the power of the political elite at the expense of the country and future generations.

One thing that happened with the legislation was raising the taxes on the very rich.  Who is dumb enough to think that is going to happen?  The very rich have tax attorneys working for them, and with a 14,000-page tax code full of loopholes, they will not be paying any additional taxes.  People in the middle class are the ones that will be paying more taxes.  Check your next paycheck and enjoy. Some of you voted for it.

How do we stop the political elite and the growth of our federal government?  They continue to take away the powers of the states and the people.  We must stop it at the ballot box, but a majority seems to continue to vote for getting something for free and taking us down the road to destruction.  There is no free lunch.

When I look at the history of our founding fathers, our Constitution and Bill of Rights, it is obvious their number one concern was limiting the size and power of the federal government.  How did our founding fathers get so smart over 200 years ago, and we get so dumb?

Religion and Politics    

       

As this holiday season comes to a close, I am reminded of the saying that to be correct socially or in business we should never talk religion or politics.  I think most of us have heard this saying.  There is a problem with this social correctness. 

Christians seem to be the ones that seem to avoid talking about religion outside of Church.  As Christians, we have let minorities like atheists take away our religious rights that were guaranteed under the first amendment.

Independents and conservatives are the ones that don’t talk politics.  The Progressives and the extremists on both the right and left are loudly advocating their position and agenda at every opportunity to anyone that will listen.  Eventually people tend to believe what they constantly hear even if the actual problems like unsustainable debt are totally ignored.  Truth and facts seem to be irrelevant.  I have to compliment the Progressives.  They have been much more vocal and done a better job than the people that are fiscally responsible.  With the help of the media, they have moved political policies that were once considered extreme left to now being considered moderate. 

        Another good example is people that oppose the rights of gun owners guaranteed under the Second Amendment.  They use recent mass shootings to try to take away these rights.  I absolutely agree every effort should be made to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and mentally unstable people with homicidal tendencies, but the anti-gun advocates want to just take guns away period without addressing the many real issues the could actually make a difference. 

If we want to stop the growth in government, stop the increasing power of the political elite, and protect our rights guaranteed under the Bill of Rights, we better stop being so politically correct and start talking to anyone and everyone that will listen.  God bless America. 

Merry Christmas

       

The birth of Christ is one of the most celebrated days in the Christian religion.  We need more Christian morality in today’s world. 

Our founding fathers knew that the republic they formed had little chance of success without religious morality.  We talk about the separation of church and state, but our founding fathers never wanted to take religion out of the government.  They just did not want the government to dictate religion or restrict people’s freedom of religious expression. 

The First Amendment to the Constitution was meant to insure religious freedom of expression.  Let’s get back to that. 

MERRY CHRISTMAS

Right to Work

       

Michigan became the 24^th state to pass Right to Work legislation last week.  Just what does Right to Work mean?  It basically means that if someone has a job where there is a union, the individual employee has the right to choose if he or she wants to join the union and pay dues.  Without Right to Work everyone must pay dues if they want the job.  The unions are strongly opposed to this legislation. 

Unions and people opposed to Right To Work claim it is a way of eliminating or reducing the power of unions.  I do not think this is a primary objective, but it does have the potential to reduce dues collected and revenues for the union. 

The opposition also claims it reduces salaries of all workers in the state.  This does not seem to be supported by the facts if cost of living is factored into the figures.  There just does not seem to be reliable figures showing higher or lower wages. 

Another argument by the opposition is that it is immoral for non-dues paying workers to benefit from the union.  Maybe, or does it take away personal freedom by forcing them to pay dues?

Proponents of Right to Work argue that it stimulates the economy and reduces unemployment.  The figures do support this assumption, but personally I think there are other factors causing this and not necessarily Right to Work legislation.  One major factor is most states with Right to Work do not have the major cities that are in urban decay.  It will be interesting to see what happens in Detroit.  

Proponents claim that companies will not consider building new plants in Right to Work states.  I am not sure this is justified, but I know it is true in some cases.  Detroit was the world leader in automobile production.  That is no longer true.  There is no question the union had some role in that decline.  How much is certainly up for debate. 

Several new automobile plants have been built in this country, but not in Detroit.  It would seem Detroit had a lot to offer.  Detroit had a trained labor force, parts suppliers, transportation, and facilities available.   Why were none of these plants started in Detroit?  How big a factor was Right to Work and the United Auto Workers?

There seem to be a lot of opinions and not a lot of clear answers.  Personally, I think it comes down to this.  If a person wants to work where there is a union, should they be forced to pay union dues, or should the union have the responsibility of showing the workers the value of paying dues?  Of course there will always be some people that want something for free without working or paying for it, but that is normal and seems to be a bigger and bigger part of our country.

The Importance of Primary Elections

       

I think the independent voter needs to pay more attention and be more active in primary elections.  I often hear that the independents determine who wins an election.  I think that is true, but unfortunately the independents too often do not get involved in the primaries which determine who is on the ballot in the general election. 

Does this mean the party candidate is not the best choice for the ballot in the general election?  Maybe it is a party favorite, or someone that has been loyal to the party in the past.  This person may not be the best choice for the independent voter or the good of the country. 

In our recent election Romney was the Republican candidate for President.  In Wisconsin, past Governor Thompson was the Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate.  I am certainly not saying either was a bad candidate, but I will say neither would have been my first or even second choice.  Were there many independents that felt the same way?  Would it have made a difference in the general election? 

Some of our states always vote for one party or the other.  I think this is ridiculous, but it seems to be a fact.  I agree with my Dad’s philosophy of voting for the person and not the party.  In these states, if someone is not involved in the primary, they have no say in determining what elected official will represent them.

Both good and bad points can be made for or against our two party system, but if the independent voter does not get involved in the primary electrons, they are diluting the power of their vote.  Get informed, get active, and vote.

Social Security Entitlements

       

It makes me mad when I hear about Social Security benefits being lumped in with all the other entitlements.  I personally, and my past employers paid for this benefit.  If this money had been deposited in any bank drawing prime interest compounded annually, it could buy an annuity when I retired with a benefit 2 to 3 times my current Social Security benefit. 

What happened to the money?  The government “borrowed” it to finance the growth in government spending.  Of course, the government gave IOUs to the Social Security account.  What do you think those IOUs are worth?

The government hopes to pay Social Security benefits with current Social Security deposits from those people still working.  I think that is what is described as a Ponzi scheme.  Isn’t that illegal?  I think people have gone to jail for that.  I guess it doesn’t apply to the government. 

We are getting screwed with the return on our money, and all increases in benefits are based on inflation and not on the cost of living.  When living expenses increase on items seniors must buy like gas and food, these items are removed from the index determining inflation. 

Since there was no inflation, according to the government, Social Security benefits were frozen for three years in spite of a huge increase in the cost of living for seniors.  Gasoline, home heating, food, health care, and insurance all increased, but benefits stayed the same. 

This is not a new problem.  Many people have known something had to be done to save Social Security and other entitlements for years, but politicians don’t want to deal with the problem.  They would rather ignore the problem, leave it to future generations, and hope there is not a total collapse. 

President Clinton and Newt Gingrich worked on a solution, but Clinton lost his political clout over the Lewinsky incident and it never happened.   Marla and I attended a breakfast for seniors where President George W. Bush and Iowa Senator Charles Grassley presented possible solutions to reform Social Security.  Unfortunately, they were never able to sell it to Congress.  People like Congressman Paul Ryan propose reforms to entitlements and are misquoted and called extremists. 

Will there be a Social Security benefit for future generations?  Many young people do not expect it to be around when they retire.  This is sad since they are paying into the program.  All entitlements, including Social Security must be reformed if they are to survive.  What to we have to do to get our elected officials to stop the B.S. and do their job?